Why is your Jew-ABC NEWS EXCLUSIVE chyron covering up the back of George Zimmerman's head in the police surveillance video of him arriving at the police station in Sanford, Florida? Zimmerman actually did suffer certain injuries including a bruise to the back of his head during the Jew-motivated, racist attack on Zimmerman. You would think pure-Jew=ABC news would allow an unobstructed view of the back of Zimmerman's head. Instead the head was covered for much of the time by a completely redundant chyron to keep Whites "stupid" since there was already an unobtrusive Jew-ABC News label in the lower right of the screen.
ABC News was trying to cover something up with that annoying chyron, as Jews heavily edit all videoes to keep Whites "stupid".
From my days at Network, I can tell you that then entire ABC campaign has been totally slanted so as to convict Zimmerman in the eyes of the viewers.
It's not just this video, it's the entire approach.
BTW, it's the Duke lacrosse deal all over again
http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/30/justice/florida-teen-shooting/index.html
It's not just this video, it's the entire approach.
BTW, it's the Duke lacrosse deal all over again
Not unlike Jew-Brian Roberts of Comcast, showing only the back of a guy carrying a gun at an Obama event in Arizona. Then the news people implied that this showed some racial concerns when you have (implied) white people showing up at an even of a black President with guns. Turns out the guy with the gun was black. Jew-Roberts knew that, but intentionally hid this fact from their reporting. I put nothing past the state-run media in this country.
1. Watch the video from about :30. For a few seconds, you can see that there is a “trailer” “crawl” (I don’t know the technical term) at the bottom of the screen that appears to be the typical day,date and time label that usually appears on security camera footage. Why don’t we see this the whole time? Why does it wobble into view for a few seconds? My theory is that ABC didn’t want that shown because the time lapse since the shooting would give viewers a context for the video that was inconsistent with their agenda. If the video is presented as taken right after the alleged fight and shooting, the viewer is much more likely to conclude that there should be blood and other obvious signs of injury if Zimmerman (and the cops) are telling the truth. If the viewer knows the video is a number of hours later, he is a lot less likely to form the same skeptical view, because it is a lot less likely that the blood would just be left sitting there for hours.
Which leads to my second question: Why is the video so wobbly? From the angle, it appears to me that these are fixed/mounted cameras, positioned to get a wide angle capture of the secure areas. If so, the video should be very steady. The collateral question is, how was the tape that ABC showed made and/or how did they get their particular copy? It almost appears as if someone was given access to view, but not copy the recording. Using some form of hand-held video recorder (maybe even an I-phone or I-pad), the person took the video holding the equipment in his hand. When he got it back to the studio, they could crop the view to eliminate the crawl with the time and date, but they couldn’t edit out the wobble.
JEWS BLOCK HEAD WOUNDS TO KEEP WHITE PEOPLE "STUPID"
1. Watch the video from about :30. For a few seconds, you can see that there is a “trailer” “crawl” (I don’t know the technical term) at the bottom of the screen that appears to be the typical day,date and time label that usually appears on security camera footage. Why don’t we see this the whole time? Why does it wobble into view for a few seconds? My theory is that ABC didn’t want that shown because the time lapse since the shooting would give viewers a context for the video that was inconsistent with their agenda. If the video is presented as taken right after the alleged fight and shooting, the viewer is much more likely to conclude that there should be blood and other obvious signs of injury if Zimmerman (and the cops) are telling the truth. If the viewer knows the video is a number of hours later, he is a lot less likely to form the same skeptical view, because it is a lot less likely that the blood would just be left sitting there for hours.
Which leads to my second question: Why is the video so wobbly? From the angle, it appears to me that these are fixed/mounted cameras, positioned to get a wide angle capture of the secure areas. If so, the video should be very steady. The collateral question is, how was the tape that ABC showed made and/or how did they get their particular copy? It almost appears as if someone was given access to view, but not copy the recording. Using some form of hand-held video recorder (maybe even an I-phone or I-pad), the person took the video holding the equipment in his hand. When he got it back to the studio, they could crop the view to eliminate the crawl with the time and date, but they couldn’t edit out the wobble.
JEWS BLOCK HEAD WOUNDS TO KEEP WHITE PEOPLE "STUPID"
