As most of you will be aware, the right wing writer John Derbyshire was
summarily sacked by National Review earlier this year as punishment for
an article he had written for a separate source which dared to be a
little too truthful when addressing that now most dangerous of topics,
race.
Derbyshire’s article which was published by Taki Magazine in March was entitled “The Talk Nonblack version” and was a response to various reports in the media of the alleged talk which African American parents claim to have with their children regarding the perils of living amongst white people. However, Derbyshire addressed the issue from the perspective of a white parent advising their child on how to deal with living with black people.
Unfortunately, in doing so John Derbyshire ignored the first commandment of modern day race politics, namely that what is good for the black goose can have near fatal consequences for the white gander.
His assertion, backed by copious statistics, that associating with black people places young whites at a significant level of risk broke the greatest of 21st Century taboos by daring to tell the truth and was greeted by shrieks of outrage by the chattering fantasists and media zealots whom we have inexplicably allowed to adopt the role of arbitrators of what it is and is not permissible to debate.
Surrendering cravenly to the demands of the pike wielding mob, National Review genuflected in a manner which would make a North Korean public mourner blush and dismissed Derbyshire from his long standing role as a columnist.
Like Pat Buchanan before him, driven out the shrill demands of the assorted pressure groups of the new world order, Derbyshire had become unemployable by the mainstream media and deprived on the means of making a living or supporting his family.
Derbyshire’s article which was published by Taki Magazine in March was entitled “The Talk Nonblack version” and was a response to various reports in the media of the alleged talk which African American parents claim to have with their children regarding the perils of living amongst white people. However, Derbyshire addressed the issue from the perspective of a white parent advising their child on how to deal with living with black people.
Unfortunately, in doing so John Derbyshire ignored the first commandment of modern day race politics, namely that what is good for the black goose can have near fatal consequences for the white gander.
His assertion, backed by copious statistics, that associating with black people places young whites at a significant level of risk broke the greatest of 21st Century taboos by daring to tell the truth and was greeted by shrieks of outrage by the chattering fantasists and media zealots whom we have inexplicably allowed to adopt the role of arbitrators of what it is and is not permissible to debate.
Surrendering cravenly to the demands of the pike wielding mob, National Review genuflected in a manner which would make a North Korean public mourner blush and dismissed Derbyshire from his long standing role as a columnist.
Like Pat Buchanan before him, driven out the shrill demands of the assorted pressure groups of the new world order, Derbyshire had become unemployable by the mainstream media and deprived on the means of making a living or supporting his family.
I have to admit that, in my view, The Talk Nonblack version, was not a
particularly good article, and I would argue with some of the points
which John Derbyshire makes, his advice that a black man standing for
political office should be scrutinised more closely than a white man
does not stand up to scrutiny when one considers that the greatest
political crimes against the white race have been committed by
traitorous white politicians
Also, although there are many examples from Dr Esmee Ruck in 1950's Kenya through to anti Apartheid campaigner Amy Biehl in a South African Township in 1993, and this guy, just last month exposing the dangers experienced by whites who play the good Samaritan to blacks, Derbyshire should have realised that his advice that whites avoid helping blacks in need would expose him to false allegations of hate and bigotry.
However, Derbyshire was not sacked for writing a bad article, he was sacked for speaking the truth, it was for that crime the twitter-nazis demanded his head.
However, I am delighted to note that he has not been cowed or intimidated and that in his latest article, again published on the Taki Magazine site, he continues to express his non conformist views with as much aplomb and vigor as he continues to expose great lies of our current age such as “the lie that poverty causes crime, the lie that white people’s malice causes black poverty, the lie that race is a mere “social construct” with no biological reality"
Also, although there are many examples from Dr Esmee Ruck in 1950's Kenya through to anti Apartheid campaigner Amy Biehl in a South African Township in 1993, and this guy, just last month exposing the dangers experienced by whites who play the good Samaritan to blacks, Derbyshire should have realised that his advice that whites avoid helping blacks in need would expose him to false allegations of hate and bigotry.
However, Derbyshire was not sacked for writing a bad article, he was sacked for speaking the truth, it was for that crime the twitter-nazis demanded his head.
However, I am delighted to note that he has not been cowed or intimidated and that in his latest article, again published on the Taki Magazine site, he continues to express his non conformist views with as much aplomb and vigor as he continues to expose great lies of our current age such as “the lie that poverty causes crime, the lie that white people’s malice causes black poverty, the lie that race is a mere “social construct” with no biological reality"
