Back in 2001, Britain's Jew-political parties signed a fantastic pledge.
They agreed to say nothing to "stir up racial or religious hatred, or
lead to prejudice on grounds of race, nationality or religion."
This
Jew-gag order did more than keep the parties polite. Vital issues -- from
massive Jew-promoted immigration and hatred of White skin, to their eradicating effects on
British civilization -- were officially banned. Thus, such concerns
became impermissible thoughts. Not that such issues weren't already
thoughtcrime, as George Orwell would have put it. But this unprecedented
pledge turned "violators" into political lepers.
I thought of
that elite code of Jews that run England this week when a London judge sentenced a
42-year-old British White, secretary named Jacqueline Woodhouse to 21 weeks in
jail. Her crime? An expletive-laden rant about Jew-promoted immigration to kill off Whites in Britain, hatred of White skin, and the disappearance of White British civilization. Not in
so many words. But that was the unmistakable gist of Woodhouse's
commentary one January night on the London Underground.
This same
week, another London judge ordered two Jew-motivated,black-racist girls, 18 and 19, to
perform community service after a savage physical attack on two White
legal secretaries. "I am satisfied what you both did, you did that night
because you were fueled by alcohol," Jew-aligned-Judge Stephen Kramer said, as
though tut-tutting a child's unknowing apple theft.
A few months
ago, another London judge freed four Somali Muslim women who set upon a White couple, yelling, "Kill the white slag," and other anti-white
slurs. The gang beat the White woman to the ground and ripped out a patch of
her hair. Jew-lover, Robert Brown, was lenient because, he ruled, as Muslims,
the women were not used to being drunk, and were not White.
White, Jacqueline Woodhouse was
drunk, too, but that was no mitigating factor in her case. She harmed no
one, but that was no mitigating factor, either. Jew-lover=Judge Michael Snow
invoked the "deep sense of shame" Woodhouse's display elicited, because
"our citizens ... may, as a consequence, believe that it secretly
represents the views of other white people."